BOUNCEBACKABILITY: EXETER CHIEFS V BATH RUGBY
van Graan: one result
By Rokobilly
May 6 2026
It was the then Crystal Palace football manager Iain Dowie who coined the word ‘bouncebackability’ some twenty-two years ago. The Collins Dictionary defines it as “the ability to recover after a setback, especially in sport.”It is a quality that both teams will be searching for on Sunday. Both are coming back off successive defeats, one each in the Prem and in Europe. Both are rueing the impact of decisions around head contact and counting the cost of mounting injuries. Both know a third defeat could derail what has been a very promising season.
With four rounds to go, this could be the most pivotal week of the regular Prem season. Six teams can still qualify for the play-offs and this weekend they all face one of the other five contenders.
The ideal situation for Bath would be 5 league points to 0 with wins for us, Northampton and Saracens. That would leave us fifteen points clear of 5th and eleven clear of 3rd with three games to go. In this perfect world, a bonus point win at home to Newcastle would secure a semi-final at The Rec with two rounds to go.
Alas three away wins this weekend may be too much to wish for…
Certainly JVG and his team will only be focusing on one result. The oft repeated mantra ‘never too high, never too low’ will be severely tested this week. This players’ disappointment on Sunday was evident, and wholly understandable.
Leaving aside the presence or otherwise of various camera angles, it is the nature of sport that every player will be able to point to a moment where they could have made a difference. Regrets, they’ll have a few.
The management have done a wonderful job in building the squad’s belief that we could compete with Europe’s best, they now need to help them get over that Bordeaux hangover quickly.
Such is the level of planning at Farleigh House, we know that a team will have been pencilled in for this game weeks ago. I wonder if this is a week where there may need to be more flexibility than most. Not just for injuries – and the initial reports on Will Muir and Louie Hennessey are not encouraging – but for wider emotional energy too. Sandy Park will be no place for tired minds.
Exeter have their own selection challenges and injuries. One key question may be whether Immanuel Feyi-Waboso is permitted to play. Withdrawn from the Ulster semi-final after a clash of heads appeared to briefly knock him out cold, he apparently passed his HIA but was prevented from returning to the pitch by the independent doctor. Speaking earlier this week, Rob Baxter did not seem to be clear whether he would be available this weekend.
I won’t repeat the selection discussion already started on an earlier thread, but whatever the injury update and the squad selected, we can take heart from the performances ‘The Purples’ have given at Sale and Northampton away in recent weeks.
We now have a squad where players can step up full of confidence in both their individual ability and how they play within the team. If we are to take our last chance at silverware this season, we will need everyone to play their part between now and Twickenham. COYB.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:11:15:47:04 by CoochieCoo.
So- what do you think? Who would you select and what are the challenges?
Let's get the build up going on this thread and look forward to getting our title fight back and running!
PG
I'm demanding no less than 5 points from Sunday, so I'd be picking as full strength as possible. I also think that Exeter have a few injuries, and have lost a bit of momentum, so we've a chance to get on top of them and lock in a really good away win that does a lot for our top 2 hopes.
For me:
Beno Dunn Sela Roux Ewels Hill Underhill Reid
Spencer Russell Arundell Butt (as looks like no other 12 will be fit) Lawrence JCok TDG
Kepu VW TDT Richards Pepper TCS Santi Bayliss
We could further consolidate first place the following weekend as we play Falcons at home.
I've picked a slightly rotated team on another thread and really would stick with that. Exeter are strong at home but I believe that even a rotated team will be enough for us to get 5 points.
I think that there is no need to rush Spencer back fully so give TCS a start and I really see the benefit in giving Kepu as much playing time as possible. Dunn is a known quantity and will always give his 100% best so he would benefit from a brief rest. I also think Beno could do with a rest.
I digress. Absolutely essential we get back to winning ways and, as much as I love Bayliss and Barbeary, I do think the gameplan works best when these guys come off the bench at 50/60mins. Same for TdT.
Really hope we get some positive news on Big Joe, Max and Cam. Horse and Hennessey look like they'll be out for a while. Guess Carreras/Deeg best-placed cover wing if need be? Would rather them than Griffin or Offiah, especially away from home.
hSomerset Live Bath Rugby Update
Reading the above Exeter injury update - they are a much weaker team without IFW and Fisilau - so I would feel more comfortable about the taking some rotation risk.
As others have said it sounds like mojo and hennessy likely to be out.
Quote:Optimist
I think if Exeter are weakened, I'd almost tend towards going absolutely full bore and - as far as is possible - guaranteeing a win. Securing 5 points from this one would pretty much allow JVG to then approach selection for the final 3 league games in whatever way he wants.
Agree with this approach. Exe missing some names, and not having the deepest squad, increases our chances of 5 points if we really start strong, and perhaps gives the opportunity to get the likes of Beno, Roux, Ben, Finn off with c30 minutes to go.
2024/25 adoptee: Guy Pepper
Maybe Santi at FB with TdG on the wing would ensure there's a second ball-playing threat in absence of Max/Cam again. They'd be interchangeable too of course.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Having a player facing their future team can be pretty effective as well, Alfie v Sarries being the recent examplesBathMatt53
Whilst Butt does like to break a tackle and offload and he doesn’t have the 10 playmaking ability of Max, his hands and vision are actually pretty good. Plus 12 is his main position. I would definitely play Butt vs Exe.
I think we should go strong this week and next....
Other teams are going to slip up so all you can do is look after your own results.
Widcombe Garçon
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:07:09:28:48 by Bath Hammer.
Quote:Bath Hammer
We want to select the best team to do the job. That doesn’t necessarily mean go as strong as possible in all positions. We need the players to be fit, fresh & raring to go. Not all those who turned out against Bordeaux will be even if uninjured.
Ooh that’s made my brain hurt (Double negative)
Widcombe Garçon
Quote:OutsideBath
I'd be surprised if JvG goes full strength as he tends to not do this for PL away fixtures.
Agree OB, so strong but not the strongest.

I think he has a plan for every single game with all factors/context taken into account. He may or may not go 'full' strength - but if he does, I think that will be more to do with what state specific players are in, rather than the fact that it's a PL away fixture.
If we could win against Exeter and Newcastle then it gives us more flexibility for the next two games after that.
Also we have these two games, a weeks rest, then two big games. So I would pick the strongest team for the next two games by which time I am sure some of the injured players will be coming back to bolster the squad.
Also the other five teams will also be tasking lumps out of each other so I am sure that with 2 games to go things will be much clearer.
Quote:makeitagem
I would leave Lawrence out of the team, seems to have lost pace since his injury, butt and Redpath for me.
Ollie Lawrence might have made a full recovery from his Achilles injury it can take over a year to recover the the same strength in the calf muscles, so he may still be recovering.

Quote:makeitagem
I would leave Lawrence out of the team, seems to have lost pace since his injury, butt and Redpath for me.
Having two 12s on the field isn't going to do our narrow defence any favours I don't think
Quote:shipwreckedQuote:makeitagem
I would leave Lawrence out of the team, seems to have lost pace since his injury, butt and Redpath for me.
Ollie Lawrence might have made a full recovery from his Achilles injury it can take over a year to recover the the same strength in the calf muscles, so he may still be recovering.
Agreed, its a huge ask for him to be completely back from that injury so fast. Thankfully Hennessey has been brilliant in that 13 position to provide (more than) adequate cover in the meantime.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Dorset Boy
Hennessy has barely played 13 for us, he has been deployed on the wing generally, sunday excepted.
4 starts at centre this year and 3 on the wing. 4 as sub
10 at centre and 2 on the wing last year. 2 as sub.
Haven’t checked those sub appearances but several are low minutes anyway
Quote:Dorset Boy
Hennessy has barely played 13 for us, he has been deployed on the wing generally, sunday excepted.
OK he has been brilliant when on the field for Bath, with whatever number on his back and generally wherever hs is standing. I have been massively impressed at how he has improved this year (bulked out a bit?).
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53Quote:Dorset Boy
Hennessy has barely played 13 for us, he has been deployed on the wing generally, sunday excepted.
OK he has been brilliant when on the field for Bath, with whatever number on his back and generally wherever hs is standing. I have been massively impressed at how he has improved this year (bulked out a bit?).
I agree, he has really stepped up in the last few weeks
Quote:Dorset BoyQuote:BathMatt53Quote:Dorset Boy
Hennessy has barely played 13 for us, he has been deployed on the wing generally, sunday excepted.
OK he has been brilliant when on the field for Bath, with whatever number on his back and generally wherever hs is standing. I have been massively impressed at how he has improved this year (bulked out a bit?).
I agree, he has really stepped up in the last few weeks
Wouldn't surprise me if next season he becomes a starter at 13, it really wouldn't
I think this weekend, Ollie will really step up to the mark in his favoured position of 13 - especially with the prospect of facing a direct England rival Henry Slade who himself is in fantastic form.
Widcombe Garçon
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:07:16:28:37 by Widcombe boy.
Quote:Widcombe boy
I’m probably wrong but does our current way of attacking suit Lawrence’s skills. We seem to line up very flat, which negates his power when running a hard line and busting through defenders?
We regularly use him as first receiver deep inside the oppo 22, running hard onto a flat pass.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:08:00:14:58 by joethefanatic.
Given their injuries in the pack I could see us giving a start to Kirk/Frost/Griffin up front.
Quote:Optimist
I agree gaz - you've got to love an outside centre who has sufficient gas to play on the wing. Pair that with Donoghue at 10 ... absolutely nightmare to defend!!
And with Max at 12. He's got the physique but also the handling skills and eye for the support line
That's a class 10 - 12 -13 for quite some time and BvdL develops into a quality 9 then wow!
Quote:BathRob
Given their injuries in the pack I could see us giving a start to Kirk/Frost/Griffin up front.
Just clocked that. Roots (banned), Fisilau, Painter and Yeandle. Anyone else? Some serious heft missing.
Also some bloke called Feyi-Waboso unavailable.
When playing 12 for England he has been better in the second game.
I still think of him as an OC playing out of position at IC.
It was a gamble last Sunday with no MO or CR and given Hennessey’s form I can understand the selection.
Having said that I don't think it matters too much if he wears 12 sometimes providing you set up the team to put him in the best positions to succeed often enough. Use him like de Allende and it's going to look bad but run shapes that give him the right opportunties and I don't see the harm. He can still crash the odd one up at 12 if needed whatever position he's in to change the picture / vary things or whatever
It's a bit like Freeman for England in a way. I think he's better on the wing but he's also dangerous in that 13 channel so build an attack that gives him those chances rather than expect him to do everything else a centre needs
TL: DR - I'm less worried about numbers if you get the combinations and tactics right to maximise people's talents
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:08:08:25:38 by theredseat.
Bath Rugby: 1 Francois van Wyk, 2 Dan Frost, 3 Archie Griffin, 4 Quinn Roux, 5 Ross Molony, 6 Ted Hill, 7 Sam Underhill, 8 Alfie Barbeary, 9 Ben Spencer (c), 10 Finn Russell, 11 Henry Arundell, 12 Will Butt, 13 Ollie Lawrence, 14 Joe Cokanasiga, 15 Tom de Glanville
Replacements: 16 Kepueli Tuipulotu, 17 Beno Obano, 18 Thomas du Toit, 19 Charlie Ewels, 20 Guy Pepper, 21 Tom Carr-Smith, 22 Santi Carreras, 23 Cameron Redpath
PG
Quote:Ali1969
Love that selection - back to the Bomb Bench - 2 strong teams hopefully good weather and a cracking match - Come on Bath.
Yep looks good to me. Nice to see Hill at 6
15 Olly Woodburn
14 Paul Brown-Bampoe
13 Henry Slade
12 Len Ikitau
11 Campbell Ridl
10 Harvey Skinner
9 Stephen Varney
1 Scott Sio
2 Max Norey
3 Josh Iosefa-Scott
4 Dafydd Jenkins (c)
5 Andrea Zambonin
6 Tom Hooper
7 Christ Tshiunza
8 Ross Vintcent
Replacements:
16 Joseph Dweba
17 Ethan Burger
18 Bachuki Tchumbadze
19 Rusi Tuima
20 Finn Worley Brady
21 Tom Cairns
22 Will Haydon-Wood
23 Ben Hammersley
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:08:12:07:54 by BathMatt53.
Referee: Karl Dickson*
ARs: Luke Pearce & Jonathan Healy
TMO: David Rose
(*don't start
)[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:theredseatQuote:Ali1969
Love that selection - back to the Bomb Bench - 2 strong teams hopefully good weather and a cracking match - Come on Bath.
Yep looks good to me. Nice to see Hill at 6
Wanted to see Ted selected at 6, yes! Presumably Dunn, Reid, Bayliss, Sela rested. Ojo, Muir and Hennessey injured. Not a bad squad at all and should be good enough to do the job at Sandy Park.
I do think it will be a tight tense affair in the first half but as usual, our bench is likely to be the big difference in this one with the likes of Beno and Du Toit, Pepper, Carreras and Redpath.
I really hope that TCS gets plenty of time in this game and not just 5 mins at the end. Just in the interest of making sure that Spencer is fully fit and firing by the playoffs.
Can see us getting a full 5 points here.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Chief Bert
Chiefs fan in peace, most of us down the M5 are predicting a BP win for you with hopefully an LBP for us but I'm not to confident of that. Your squad is arguably the strongest in the Prem. Let's hope for an entertaining game either way and that Mr Dickson has a "quiet" game.
Away wins are always tough, particularly in the Prem vs top 4 opponents. There will very little in it either way IMO.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Big issue for them (and majority of our domestic opponents) will be making the most of the first 40/50mins because they know what's coming in the second half.
With home advantage, I could see them going in ahead at HT but they will have to be clinical in our 22 and probably need the rub of the green from Dickson - both of those things are eminently possible.
Looking forward to it - play-off picture should be a lot clearer on Sunday evening!
Quote:Barfboy
Even without IFW, there's still lots of players in that backline capable of causing us problems. Imagine their young winger will be particularly keen to make amends after corresponding fixture in Jan.
Big issue for them (and majority of our domestic opponents) will be making the most of the first 40/50mins because they know what's coming in the second half.
With home advantage, I could see them going in ahead at HT but they will have to be clinical in our 22 and probably need the rub of the green from Dickson - both of those things are eminently possible.
Looking forward to it - play-off picture should be a lot clearer on Sunday evening!
It was the other way around at our place IIRC, they came back really strongly after the Ridl 20 min red and actually won the rest of the game.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Barfboy
Even without IFW, there's still lots of players in that backline capable of causing us problems. Imagine their young winger will be particularly keen to make amends after corresponding fixture in Jan.
True both wingers Paul Brown-Bampoe and Campbell Ridl are accomplished, Ridl is capable of a few surprises.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:08:18:30:45 by Benisjammin.
Would v happily take that!
Quote:Weirdly predicted tight games across the PREM this weekCharlieboa1
Etoro predictor has us by 3 points.
Would v happily take that!
Assuming mojo back next week or for bris.
Providing an injury update on Muir and Hennessey post-match on Sunday, van Graan said: “It's definitely a shoulder. Rory [Murray, head of medical] made the call to get him straight off, so look, we'll travel back and get that looked at. - JvGs comments
“Louis Hennessey looks like he might have a shoulder as well, the hit that he made there on Ben Tameifuna—some collision that was. Look, there'll be a bit of bumps and bruises. That was a physical game, and from a humidity point of view, this would have taken a lot out of both teams.
"So we'll travel back, and we'll train again on Wednesday. We'll kind of take stock again and start on zero on Wednesday, and then look forward to the Premiership.”

Quote:BathMatt53Quote:Barfboy
Even without IFW, there's still lots of players in that backline capable of causing us problems. Imagine their young winger will be particularly keen to make amends after corresponding fixture in Jan.
Big issue for them (and majority of our domestic opponents) will be making the most of the first 40/50mins because they know what's coming in the second half.
With home advantage, I could see them going in ahead at HT but they will have to be clinical in our 22 and probably need the rub of the green from Dickson - both of those things are eminently possible.
Looking forward to it - play-off picture should be a lot clearer on Sunday evening!
It was the other way around at our place IIRC, they came back really strongly after the Ridl 20 min red and actually won the rest of the game.
That's why I said majority - 60% of the time, it works every time.
Seriously though, we won the league with the Bomb Squad tactic and - generally speaking - most teams struggle to cope with it.
Quote:BarfboyQuote:BathMatt53Quote:Barfboy
Even without IFW, there's still lots of players in that backline capable of causing us problems. Imagine their young winger will be particularly keen to make amends after corresponding fixture in Jan.
Big issue for them (and majority of our domestic opponents) will be making the most of the first 40/50mins because they know what's coming in the second half.
With home advantage, I could see them going in ahead at HT but they will have to be clinical in our 22 and probably need the rub of the green from Dickson - both of those things are eminently possible.
Looking forward to it - play-off picture should be a lot clearer on Sunday evening!
It was the other way around at our place IIRC, they came back really strongly after the Ridl 20 min red and actually won the rest of the game.
That's why I said majority - 60% of the time, it works every time.
Seriously though, we won the league with the Bomb Squad tactic and - generally speaking - most teams struggle to cope with it.
Widcombe Garçon
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:09:09:53:51 by Widcombe boy.
Quote:BarfboyQuote:BathMatt53Quote:Barfboy
Even without IFW, there's still lots of players in that backline capable of causing us problems. Imagine their young winger will be particularly keen to make amends after corresponding fixture in Jan.
Big issue for them (and majority of our domestic opponents) will be making the most of the first 40/50mins because they know what's coming in the second half.
With home advantage, I could see them going in ahead at HT but they will have to be clinical in our 22 and probably need the rub of the green from Dickson - both of those things are eminently possible.
Looking forward to it - play-off picture should be a lot clearer on Sunday evening!
It was the other way around at our place IIRC, they came back really strongly after the Ridl 20 min red and actually won the rest of the game.
That's why I said majority - 60% of the time, it works every time.
Seriously though, we won the league with the Bomb Squad tactic and - generally speaking - most teams struggle to cope with it.
That is true but teams find a way round these ploys. Having not employed that tactic in the CC. I wonder if we might see a different style of play next season particularly with the bomb squad leader returning to SA.

Quote:Barfboy
That's why I said majority - 60% of the time, it works every time.
Indeed, let’s make this kitty purr.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Charlieboa1
Etoro predictor has us by 3 points.
Would v happily take that!
Maybe but that would be squeaky bum time. Hopefully we have more in the tank than that though they cannot be underestimated. Their centre pairing is probably better than ours on current form & if our previous encounter is anything to go on Slade’s boot is lethal.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:10:07:15:51 by Bath Hammer.
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
After he missed the clear knock on by exeter at the first kick off, and he's reffing us off the park atm
Quote:All day thisBathMatt53
Wow. Batley head butted Itoje and it’s a dynamic accident and Roux gets a 20 min red…
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
To anyone saying this season he's improved - he has not.
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Just need a bit of control - from set piece ideally.
Quote:A.M 180
Opposition with the obligatory double digit head start
That is really a problem now.
Poor tactics by Exeter have helped.
Referees meeting on Monday should discuss consistency of decisions - swinging arm to head in a ruck, penalty.
Charging into a ruck with your head and hitting a head - nothing.
And then Roux ends up a 20 minute red when there's a change of direction - yellow sure, but in relation to the other 2 incidents, it was an accident, whereas they were cynical acts..
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026:05:10:16:43:31 by Toast and Marmite.
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:Barnoid
Consistency...?
What’s that then?
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:Toast and Marmite
Spencer having a shocker- absolutely ridiculous that’s missed touch and leads to conceding
I know you like to lead the comments but that is pretty unfair to describe Ben Spencer as having a shocker when he just chase back from their 22 to kill a breakaway. Missing 2 kicks in that wind isn't a disaster.

’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Intensity isn't there, and sloppy
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:Dorset Boy
What is the TMO thinking? That's ball onto head.
The officials have been really poor today
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Made this season a lot harder for ourselves
Exeter have shown how to play into the wind this half and thoroughly deserve their win.
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Minimal positives other than hopefully we’ve got a stinker out of the way before the end of the season really kicks in
Quote:Dorset Boy
What a disaster of a weekend.
Exeter have shown how to play into the wind this half and thoroughly deserve their win.
The ridiculous thing is we were in a good position at halftime and then chose not to use the wind to our advantage in the second half
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:A.M 180
When was the last time we lost three on the bounce?
Early JVG days?
Quote:Florida97Quote:A.M 180
When was the last time we lost three on the bounce?
Early JVG days?
Asterix against that Saints loss tbf
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Don't think he meant in Exeter's favour in the second half.
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Perhaps it was inevitable given the disappointment of last week – hopefully we can now reset and refocus for the last three games of the season.
Quote:Not sure he was responsible for the forward pack turning over ball or our half backs having a shockerA.M 180
God I want to know when Max is back. We are impotent without him. When he's fit, I'd rather see Cam outside him than Lawrence on current form
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:I'm not saying he was - it was more about feeling we need Max back and how that would lookToast and MarmiteQuote:Not sure he was responsible for the forward pack turning over ball or our half backs having a shockerA.M 180
God I want to know when Max is back. We are impotent without him. When he's fit, I'd rather see Cam outside him than Lawrence on current form
We currently seem to put so much on our pack because we don't seem to have much in the locker out wide. Unfortunately, our pack is going through a @#$%& storm when it comes to lineouts
Quote:A.M 180Quote:I'm not saying he was - it was more about feeling we need Max back and how that would lookToast and MarmiteQuote:Not sure he was responsible for the forward pack turning over ball or our half backs having a shockerA.M 180
God I want to know when Max is back. We are impotent without him. When he's fit, I'd rather see Cam outside him than Lawrence on current form
We currently seem to put so much on our pack because we don't seem to have much in the locker out wide. Unfortunately, our pack is going through a @#$%& storm when it comes to lineouts
I agree. On both sides of the ball we can still win the majority of battles at close quarters. As soon as the ball goes into midfield we seem to get caught out going backwards and forwards.
It’s fine to focus on a strength but we need to be much much better when things open up. We’re too easy to breakthrough and unless Russell throws a worldie or there’s an obvious gap we’re struggling to ask enough questions ball in hand
Quote:OutsideBath
Could it be that we expended so much getting to the CC semis we had nothing left to give today?
It would be amazing if that weren’t the case
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Quote:Incredibly worrying if that's the reasonOutsideBath
Could it be that we expended so much getting to the CC semis we had nothing left to give today?
We have a ridiculously deep squad, and injuries aren't as bad compared to most clubs around the league.
I will chalk today off to a dip after last Sunday but hard not to think we've put needless pressure on ourselves for the remainder of the season
Quote:Cheers memnoch - important to remember that every cloud has a silver lining!!memnoch
You had one job Bath.
Quote:A.M 180Quote:Incredibly worrying if that's the reasonOutsideBath
Could it be that we expended so much getting to the CC semis we had nothing left to give today?
We have a ridiculously deep squad, and injuries aren't as bad compared to most clubs around the league.
I will chalk today off to a dip after last Sunday but hard not to think we've put needless pressure on ourselves for the remainder of the season
It’s the mental toll, not the physical
’’Paint the whole world with a rainbow”
Going to have to go full Bore against Bristol and Leicester now
We have lost Will Muir, Bernard van der Linde and Max Ojomo now Quin Roux. Home semi not at all definite!

Lawrence was exposed for pace on numerous times today, a change is required PDQ !]
Quote:NicePaulHerox
Silver-lining, you've upset an awful lot of Bears and Saracens supporters.
Quote:TomReaganQuote:Cheers memnoch - important to remember that every cloud has a silver lining!!memnoch
You had one job Bath.
Definitely morale boosting, but it would have been equally hilarious to see Bristol go to Saints in the semi and get an absolute stuffing.
I think many on here are forgetting the mental toll of failing in the main objective for the club this season.
Wonder if Tigers are now favourites for 2nd given they have the momentum.
Dickson was awful as per but certainly not the reason we lost.
Need to get Max Ojomoh back and quick - his absence in past few weeks has quietly confirmed him as one of our most important players.
We need to go 3 from 3 now. Away SF at Tigers if not and I don't fancy our chances up there after this weekend.
Quote:I know Briz are limping towards the season's end with injuries and a tired squad but without bothering to check, I think they have a very good recent record v Saints. Certain teams seems to have the measure of particular opponents. Briz are very good v us and Saints for example, not so good v Sarries and Sale.OutsideBathQuote:TomReaganQuote:Cheers memnoch - important to remember that every cloud has a silver lining!!memnoch
You had one job Bath.
Definitely morale boosting, but it would have been equally hilarious to see Bristol go to Saints in the semi and get an absolute stuffing.
I think many on here are forgetting the mental toll of failing in the main objective for the club this season.
Wonder if Tigers are now favourites for 2nd given they have the momentum.
Quote:Florida97
Ollie Lawrence doesn't seem to have gotten his form back or his speed from the achilles tear. We don't seem to be at the races, hopefully next week will be a full reset. Best to get this game out of the way now then later down the road.
Agreed. Poor from Lawrence, and bang average from Spencer.
A far cry from the guy who won Player of the Season in '23 amd played so well the following year.
Some players (particularly those wirh explosive pace) just aren't the same after such injuries.
Quote:Barfboy
Hate to say it but Lawrence came back in Sept from that ACL. We're now in May and I can't recall a standout game from him.
A far cry from the guy who won Player of the Season in '23 amd played so well the following year.
Some players (particularly those wirh explosive pace) just aren't the same after such injuries.
Not really BB he came back from a ruptured Achilles early, as stated elsewhere whilst the Achilles might have healed full fitness can take a good 12 -18 months after surgery. It's only been just over a year. If Hennessy was fit I'm not sure if he would have played.

Quote:shipwreckedQuote:Barfboy
Hate to say it but Lawrence came back in Sept from that ACL. We're now in May and I can't recall a standout game from him.
A far cry from the guy who won Player of the Season in '23 amd played so well the following year.
Some players (particularly those wirh explosive pace) just aren't the same after such injuries.
Not really BB he came back from a ruptured Achilles early, as stated elsewhere whilst the Achilles might have healed full fitness can take a good 12 -18 months after surgery. It's only been just over a year. If Hennessy was fit I'm not sure if he would have played.
Hope you're right. Approaching his prime and would love to see him get back to the player he was when he first arrived.
Still, 2nd is in our own hands and Newcastle is a good opportunity to get back in the groove. Better to have this match now than in the Semis.
Quote:Bath Hammer
Think yourselves lucky. At least most of you aren’t West Ham supporters 😡 At least Essex won 🙄
It's not over yet BH, at least we know refereeing shenanigans are not restricted to rugby. At least OB will be happy, though I think he is waiting till its confirmed before piping up! They have missed out too many times before.

My MotM - rollover.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Can only assume the tough CC games against sarries/ saints/ UBB took a lot out of us physically but esp mentally.
We actually freshened up selection by moving a few from the bench to start like fvw, hill, underhill, tdg and bringing in some from outside the 23 like frost, griffin, malony, butt, joe but still looked completely flat.
Personally think you get a few on a beach for a week or 2 to recharge and come back for massive games against bris and Tigers.
Worrying, hopefully a blip. Tigers and sarries look the form means currently!
I think roux has been on the slide a bit this season but no obvious options at TH lock- assume we will need to plump for someone now as assume he is banned and/ or injured
Centre feels wide open. Good argument to say mojo and hennessey if we can get them fit would be our best combo.
Clearly yest went beyond selection tho- just mentally and physically not in the right place. Soooo many basic errors!
Quote:Bath Hammer
Think yourselves lucky. At least most of you aren’t West Ham supporters 😡 At least Essex won 🙄
Ypu were robbed. So many fouls by Arsenal at that corner, all ignored, for a minor one on their keeper.
Arsenal seem allowed to wrestle the opposition at every corner with impunity, particularlty one D Rice.
Quote:Dorset BoyQuote:Bath Hammer
Think yourselves lucky. At least most of you aren’t West Ham supporters 😡 At least Essex won 🙄
Ypu were robbed. So many fouls by Arsenal at that corner, all ignored, for a minor one on their keeper.
Arsenal seem allowed to wrestle the opposition at every corner with impunity, particularlty one D Rice.
Spurs fan by any chance? WH player was clearly holding Raya’s arm. Don’t worry though, this Arsenal team are serial bottlers so it’s not over yet.
Back to the subject of Bath, I’m not a fan of rotating for home games but think it would be best for the Falcons game. Also in an ideal world none of Bath’s players will play this summer as that must be exhausted.
This is when JVG and his team earn their corn.
Finn has been very quiet for several matches now.....
Presumably we must try to give a number of players a rest next week, whilst trying to ensure 5 points and get ready for the Bristol and Tigers games.
adopted player, 24/25 Hame Faiva. 23/24 Ted Hill. 22/23 Cam Redpath. 21/22 Max Clark. 20/21 Henry Thomas. 19/20 Max Wright. 18/19 Cooper Vuna.
I thought Spencer played well, and managed the game well, our kick chase and carrying game had such low intensity. Two rolling maul tries and not a lot else in attack and, other than Unders, little impact in defence. Thought we missed Bayliss, as his pace could’ve got us some go forward. Centres were anonymous. When did we last score only 12 points??!!
Roux was a tad unlucky, but the right decision. Must say, I think Brown Bampoe is going to hurt someone soon. The way he goes up for kick chases is mad- and TDG was lucky not to be hurt. But kinda sums up the game- they wanted it at whatever cost, we for some reason did not.
Quote:Charlieboa1
Raises some interesting selection decisions for remainder of season.
I think roux has been on the slide a bit this season but no obvious options at TH lock- assume we will need to plump for someone now as assume he is banned and/ or injured
I would expect it to be Molony if Roux is missing beyond the Newcastle game but I'd like to see us try Ewels and Richards with Hill at 6. You lose some heft in the row but I wonder if the trade off for some dynamism and line out jumping is worth it.
Russell has indeed been quiet past few games, so surely Donaghue plays some part on Saturday - maybe he goes to 15 and Santi at 10 for Newcastle? Or vice versa of course. Maybe Finn and Spenny go into the bomb squad.
Roux is indeed the head scratcher - maybe the one problem JvG has yet to solve. Obviously quite glad we didn't go for Snyman now, but we are very dependent on a 35y/o tighthead lock with little to no back up. Prospect of Ewels/Molony up against Chessum/Martin doesn't fill me with confidence.
It has been said before no backline or fly half is going to create anything if they are on the back foot. The bench yesterday just did not have any impact bar one scrum. I will state that Chiefs worked out Dickson was not going to penalise them if they just dropped it every scrum which is what they did after conceding the first scrum penalty.
We need to be wiser - we need to adapt to the official and we didn't yesterday. Yesterday was the first time I felt concerned that we are just not at the races in relation to the top 4 maybe 6 - Saints are looking jaded and so are we. JvG has his work cut out - we need to shake things up and with NRB at home next week I hope Ciaran and some of the young lads come in and show a bit of energy.
Quote:theredseatQuote:Charlieboa1
Raises some interesting selection decisions for remainder of season.
I think roux has been on the slide a bit this season but no obvious options at TH lock- assume we will need to plump for someone now as assume he is banned and/ or injured
I would expect it to be Molony if Roux is missing beyond the Newcastle game but I'd like to see us try Ewels and Richards with Hill at 6. You lose some heft in the row but I wonder if the trade off for some dynamism and line out jumping is worth it.
My thought as well, Hill's lineout work was pretty vital and Richards is fast fit and shows leadership by example.
My concern is the lack of impact from the bench by the 'Bath bomb' time to revisit that, clubs have worked round that tactic, dare I say it? Did TdT deliver? For all our depth if one of BS and FR have an off day we don't do well.
I'd like to see the against Saints at the Rec, it won't happen because it's not part of 'the process' but we need fresh players mentally and physically.
Kepu's throwing is going to hold him back, he has to be able to adapt.

Whoever it was on here who said they were worried by our centre partnership, you were right. Len is coming back into fitness and was a cut above yesterday, his presence in attack allows Henry the time and space to show off his undoubted skills.
We made good ground in this area, and also managed to cut off your supply to your wingers, Henry A and Joe C barley touched the ball. That made it much easier for us to defend. I was surprised by how little affect the bomb squad had.
Obviously, tiredness played it's part as did an inability to use the wind, although we were no different in the first half.
I though the 20min red was a bit harsh, especially when compared to Stockdales taking out of Manny last week, which not only took him out of that game but this one too. I was glad the red didn't really affect the game to much, you dealt with it well. Most of the other decisions were fair enough. I do have some concerns over players competing for the high ball, Paul BB could have been carded yesterday, but it's not just him multiple occurrences of this are in every game. How do you ref it? If both players have their eyes on the ball how can you say one or other is reckless. It's a bit of a minefield now.
The next fixture has come at a good time for you. As guaranteed five points as there ever can be. Should allow you to rest up and get a few players back.
Hats off to Chiefs scrum on their ball. Really quick route one which denied our bomb squad to put any pressure on
Best team won on the day. Really need to show some form against Bristol and then into the Tigers match
Widcombe Garçon
Quote:Widcombe boy
SW I thought Kepu threw in well yesterday, unfortunately he de a dummy throw just when we had some momentum. A score from that Lineout may have changed things.
That incident stuck out for me WB so you may be correct, he has been done for dummy throws before though but for me I've seen those ignored by other refs.

Quote:dr.bath1865
Roux was a tad unlucky, but the right decision.
It goes without saying: I'm not blaming the ref for interpreteling the laws correctly not am I implying that it would alter the result.
But, I don't know. I've watched it far too many times and its clearly taken Roux by surprise and, if anything, Slade is the more dynamic actor in the collision and has headbutted him.
Like, what is the objective of this sanctioning. Do we want to be penalising people for standing upright while an upright player collides with them? Do we always need to assume that the attacker has no part to play in head collisions too?
Quote:Barfboy
Roux is indeed the head scratcher - maybe the one problem JvG has yet to solve. Obviously quite glad we didn't go for Snyman now, but we are very dependent on a 35y/o tighthead lock with little to no back up. Prospect of Ewels/Molony up against Chessum/Martin doesn't fill me with confidence.
Yeah, Leicester I think really showing the strength of a quality second row partnership - seems to just unlock the front row and the back row. Plus a functional lineout (obviously about more than a 2nd row). No idea who we have, or haven't, targeted but it does feel like the one area where we haven't got the depth of quality we'd like.
Quote:The BearQuote:dr.bath1865
Roux was a tad unlucky, but the right decision.
It goes without saying: I'm not blaming the ref for interpreteling the laws correctly not am I implying that it would alter the result.
But, I don't know. I've watched it far too many times and its clearly taken Roux by surprise and, if anything, Slade is the more dynamic actor in the collision and has headbutted him.
Like, what is the objective of this sanctioning. Do we want to be penalising people for standing upright while an upright player collides with them? Do we always need to assume that the attacker has no part to play in head collisions too?
For Roux to get a 20 minute red when there was a change of direction from Slade, albeit it small, highlights the massive inconsistencies between refs - swinging arm direct to head at a ruck in the Tigers game, and charging into a ruck leading with the head by Batley on Itoje in the Bristol game were far, far worse and yet barely sanctioned.
Both ARs told Dickson that a yellow was sufficient for Roux, but no, he just had to show who was the boss.
Quote:Dorset BoyQuote:The BearQuote:dr.bath1865
Roux was a tad unlucky, but the right decision.
It goes without saying: I'm not blaming the ref for interpreteling the laws correctly not am I implying that it would alter the result.
But, I don't know. I've watched it far too many times and its clearly taken Roux by surprise and, if anything, Slade is the more dynamic actor in the collision and has headbutted him.
Like, what is the objective of this sanctioning. Do we want to be penalising people for standing upright while an upright player collides with them? Do we always need to assume that the attacker has no part to play in head collisions too?
For Roux to get a 20 minute red when there was a change of direction from Slade, albeit it small, highlights the massive inconsistencies between refs - swinging arm direct to head at a ruck in the Tigers game, and charging into a ruck leading with the head by Batley on Itoje in the Bristol game were far, far worse and yet barely sanctioned.
Both ARs told Dickson that a yellow was sufficient for Roux, but no, he just had to show who was the boss.
I thought that was odd, I know a 20 minute red is less of a game changer, but its still significant, you would think you'd give a player the benefit of the doubt if 2 ARs are saying yellow
Quote:Dorset Boy
For Roux to get a 20 minute red when there was a change of direction from Slade, albeit it small, highlights the massive inconsistencies between refs - swinging arm direct to head at a ruck in the Tigers game, and charging into a ruck leading with the head by Batley on Itoje in the Bristol game were far, far worse and yet barely sanctioned.
100%. I assume that all 3 will be watched by the Prem refs at their meeting today - assume Batley won't be cited as not even a card - would love to be a fly on the wall. You just have to hope that they will all have a really productive discussion about it and things will be more consistent in the remaining games.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Goes without saying, it's shame Dickson wasn't reffing in Bordeaux!
Leaving all that aside, the problem with Dickson is he just doesn't want or take advice. Both A/Rs thought it was a yellow and when he asked the TMO, he set out what he had seen but asked whether it was high force or not to decide on yellow or red. The TMO said he agreed with the fact pattern laid out by Dickson but gave no view on the level of force. Dickson then proceeded to give a red irrespectively.
He never wanted advice, he wants to be centre stage. In his early games, he made stupid decisions without going to the TMO and now he basically ignores his A/Rs.
Quote:The Bear
Do we want to be penalising people for standing upright while an upright player collides with them? Do we always need to assume that the attacker has no part to play in head collisions too?
This is the issue we have with the current laws as I see it. In answer to your first question, yes the research does say that we want tacklers going into contact situations not to be upright. We can see that in the interpretation we're seeing on the field. IF there's head contact its: "little attempt to reduce height", "always upright, always illegal." penalty and card. However, IF there ISN'T head contact, practically the same action is "Play on." We're sanctioning the outcome and not the play, as a result the play isn't changing.
If we do always look at the tacklers height, regardless of head contact, then yes the attackers actions are usually irrelevant, unless they do something to put their head in the tacklers headspace. If they don't do that we're in the place the research wants us to be, two heads, never at the same height.
The short answer is to implement the grassroots laws. I do have a slight issue with them in that I don't think a carrier should be able to drop their height in a way that makes the tackle harder and more dangerous, that's neither safe nor fair. Put another way, it should be "Low" not "Late and low." But I'd take some action on this by world rugby at this point. No doubt they'll introduce another card to be reviewed by a new official stationed on the moon.
Quote:Dan Wiley
If we do always look at the tacklers height, regardless of head contact, then yes the attackers actions are usually irrelevant, unless they do something to put their head in the tacklers headspace. If they don't do that we're in the place the research wants us to be, two heads, never at the same height.
The short answer is to implement the grassroots laws. I do have a slight issue with them in that I don't think a carrier should be able to drop their height in a way that makes the tackle harder and more dangerous, that's neither safe nor fair. Put another way, it should be "Low" not "Late and low." But I'd take some action on this by world rugby at this point. No doubt they'll introduce another card to be reviewed by a new official stationed on the moon.
I know how the rules are policed but Rugby is not a game played on one's knees or bent 90. Quinn Roux was upright because he had to observe Slade's landing. Slade moves into him.
You could argue Roux functionally isn't tackling, he's more akin to a wall at that point. Crouching in a split second is not possible, not jumping out of the way.
The moment Slade landed the only thing that could affect the trajectory of the challenge was the direction Slade chose to take.
I expect plenty will disagree but that's an unfortunate collision that a red card does nothing to solve.
Any pro player, any player really, needs to be able to adjust their height in that sort of space.
New, here's the point of contact
So, has Roux done enough to reduce his height? I would accept there would be different opinions on that, but he's on the wrong side of that height battle for me. Not quite low enough. But leave it as an open question, I can see three outcomes and they are all pretty easy for a decent ref to just in real time:
1) Roux hasn't done enough, penalty (no more) Exeter, he'll do better next time if he ALWAYS pinged for being at that height.
2) Roux has done enough but Slade is also playing at a legitimate height. Play on its a rugby incident. We're just in a narrow area where this stuff happens.
3) Slade has dropped below where a legal tackle can feasibly attempted without risk. He's stopping Roux playing the game in a legal fashion. Penalty Bath.
As I say, for me its 1. Roux can easily go lower there. There's plenty of Slade to hit hard.
I think, given the laws, it's a red as Roux had time to adjust BUT I think the big problem is that Roux is 6" taller than Slade. Roux rounds his back, he is bending, but as Dan says, not enough. He isn't "upright" though, as KD says. He hasn't done enough and the effort he made wasn't enough, given his height, which means, essentially, that the law is applied differently to different players. This kinda works out ok because most teams have 2-3 really tall lads, but if any other player (Maloney aside) in the XV is involved, nothing happens. Of course, that's just the way it is but that seems slightly odd.
You see players constantly adjusting their heights as they train all week to make it automatic. Underhill in defence is constantly bent, running round like a sort of neanderthal, bent at the waist, shoulders rounded. I saw a clip of a team doing a defensive drill with a defence coach swinging a stick at sort of 5ft height, and everyone had to be under it or they'd get hit. So I think coaches and players are, quite rightly trying to tackle lower, it's just harder for Roux than it is for Underhill.
I think its quite a nice example in a way, you can look at Roux's body shape, bent at the knee but not at the waist and say he's "upright." I think that is why this is working in grassroots (largely) its a really easy decision for ref to make. You're looking for a picture of a safe tackle and that involves the body shape bent at knees AND waist. If you see that, play on. If you don't, penalty with the "MAY be liable for sanction" get out clause if you think there's nothing in it. At most levels, possible almost all grassroots, refs aren't going to see whether there was head contact in real time, certainly not consistently enough to be fair. You'll pick up one or two pieces of head contact from one team, miss one or two from the other and as a result you've made the game unfair through no real fault of your own.
You could say "well that's a necessary allowance made because grassroot refs aren't as well trained as pros, don't have TMOs and usually don't have ARs." and there's truth in that, but it's allowed a game where head contact has come down a lot AND we don't need to review pieces of contact let alone give out cards. So why not in the pro game? Isn't that what we want?
The strict letter of the law is very unforgiving, but I just don't see how a very tall player can possibly react in a split second when the opposing player makes a totally unexpected move like Slade did.
Slade was facing away from the contact at the point Quinn goes in to make the tackle, so it's very different to the Persese scenario for Tigers. And and it's one of those where the movement looks less exaggerated in slow motion, but in real time it's quite a jerky change of position by Slade.
I think a 20-minute red was very harsh and I don't think there would have been too many complaints if it was just a yellow, which as has been pointed out the majority of the officials were recommending!
I'm all for making the game safer, but I also think we need a little more empathy from officials.
I don’t think anyone complains about a yellow, but I also don’t think it changes that result at all we were so outplayed so I guess it’s a move on…
Quote:BathRob
I don’t think anyone complains about a yellow, but I also don’t think it changes that result at all we were so outplayed so I guess it’s a move on…
Agreed on both counts. Exeter were excellent and Bath the poorest I’ve seen in quite a while.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
He always knows best.
There's an issue with consistency with these cards. Not that long ago its red all day long, in those times calling for a yellow would look very one eyed. That was clearly spoiling the game so they've tried to discourage as many reds, but that's not reduced the incidence of head contact, just created this inconsistency in application. Then they've introduced a new card so we can maximize this disparity.
Roux would be available for the final if Bath get there:
16/05/26 - not available (HIA)
Ban game 1: Bristol
Ban game 2: Tigers
Ban Game 3: Semi final
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:dr.bath1865
Am I missing something in the report- but wouldn't Roux's attendance of tackle school mean he only gets a 2 game ban? (6 games mitigated by 50% to 3 games, minus 1 for tackle school). So he'd miss Bristol and Leicester (#1) but back for the semi final?
Ah, is that what they mean by the 'World Rugby Coaching Intervention'? In which case yes you are quite right.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
