Victory at Rotherham - The Fans View
By Hippo
October 17 2003
Here are the weekly comments from the frontline, this week at Millmoor, Rotherham. Initial enthusiasm followed by a sanguine appraisal. In the words of Stockers…………….
Well done Saints, 5 points well earned but as my school
reports used to say EVERY year, "could do so much better with a little
more application"
Well done to Seely though – how many games?
Initial enthusiasm
i know one report stated that beal carried 3 defenders over
the line to score the try!!! and he did!! David Tavener
Well done boys St Tim
Just arrived back. Well done the lads. Still many
improvements to be made, . Chris
Hoddle
A definite improvement by Saints on their previous 2
matches, especially defensively where the organisation was better....relief to
have AB lurking around that 12 channel! BBF
MOTM
for the man of the match. Suggestions:
Lordy - working hard as ever
Blowers - great to see him back
Howard - first choice no 9, surely?
Hyndman - cracking try
Reihana - great all round play
Drahm - Paul who?
Smurf
lordy - streamline new haircut,
oh and dogged all over the field and winning both ours and stealing their
lineout. Conners - first time in
a long time have i been happy that we can cope with blowers out of his best
position. Blowers - showed what
we have been missing and certainly showed roths how to tackle hard. Drahm - jinxing lil ****** ain't he?
reliable with the bot not to mention audacious (spelling) long range kick just
went wide Riehana - invented the
new way to beat the defensive line....if you can't get past it take it with
you. made hard yards and telling tackles.
hyndman/tucker/howard/clarke - pick one. they all did what was required
when had to. TAV
ok i know i already picked 6 but another one is brett
sturgess....without a doubt the pick of the front row today. at times i
felt like i was watching a mixture of wally and pagel rolled into one when he
had the ball out in the open. watching the defenders bounce off him as he
charged up the field on a few occasions was mouthwatering to say the least!! TAV
Without wishing to take away from my match report:-
Lordy (head and shoulders above the rest) Sturgess Richmond Fox
Howard then I'm torn between
Hyndman and Reihana. Mark H
Foxy must be in there somewhere. Wookie is getting back to his
best Brett Sturgess is getting
there in a hurry. Bruiser Reihana is
now simply awesome - an overused expression but well deserved in this
case. JP for the worst haircut
ever and Rob Hunter for a poor imitation. I also think Mark Tucker deserves a mention. Andy B - just to see those legs
pumping in full flight again was worth the trip.
It's hard to pick out 6 when the opposition made them all look pretty useful
but on balance I think Foxy's return to prominence wins it for me. WMS
Surprised nobody else has mentioned Bealer who was
absolutely outstanding. Roth has all sorts of trouble trying to stop him.
Others would be AB, Bruce, Handyman, Lordy & Rob Hunter. Gregor
Opposition
Roth were full of grit and endeavour but there was no guile WMS
Much
as I'd hate to see it, Roth are doomed already - the quality (although not the
spirit - they've got bagfuls of that) is just not there. Mark H
relly showed how much Roth have to do to get anywhere near
staying up. I should think with a full team we will top 50 points at home Chris
Hoddle
Rotherham were dreadful, which does not augur (spell?) well
for their season. The only hope of them staying up was presumably to rack up a
few wins against the "weakened " teams.
Northants Wasp
Listening to Radio Nuthampton made me think it was more Roth
not being up to the Premiership. They seemed to waste several good chances and
froze on occasions when the defence opened. St BART
Unfortuinately Roth were so much off the pace that the
second half was not a real contest. Shame.
Laurie
relatively rare away trip for me and I came away satisfied
with a more than adequate performance against opposition which though spirited,
lacked pace and nous at this level. tedge
However as everyone is saying, Rotherham were poor
opposition & could easily be doomed by Christmas.... BBF
So how good were we?
Bumped into the artist formerly known as shaddo for the
second week running in the Charles Bradlaugh (I suspect he lives there,) he
said that the Saints looked like a real team today but admitted that Roth were
not that good. So what's everyone else's perspective? RICH
For the saints, I do wish Johnny Howard wouldn't keep
doing the pass behind his back trick. It never works and always runs the risk
of giving a breakaway score. Northants wasp
I thought we looked more solid in defence than of late, Blower's
contribution as notable as ever. There were a few "mad" moments which
might have been punished by others, some of the passing was a bit airy fairy; Howard
in particular will have to curb his flamboyance if he is to develop into an
unchallenged first choice at 9. Tedge
I don't even think Saints played that well. Mark H
Good report, Mark. We had the same feeling, almost as if we
had lost which is bizarre……
It was great to have AB back. I wasn't sure that Johnny
Howard played that well. Oriol looked up for it and it is a shame he didn't go
for it when in the clear on the left late in the second half. Bruce still looks
absolute class and I was amazed he didn't score. Laurie
It left me feeling the same. Could have done so much better,
too many little mistakes early on especially and once we had the bonus there
was a period when we seemed to have 15 individuals going for glory rather than
a team. Fortunately we "regrouped" for the final try.
Our defence was working so much better.
Stockers
Defence
It was with real interest that I noted the comments about
our defence, that we mark from outside to in and Shine (who in every other
department has been a star and a real Saintsman) was the problem against Wasps.
This to me, with my limited knowledge of girls play (more a donkeys man myself)
does seem a very dangerous style as one missed tackle and the opposition are clean
through the middle with no/ very little cover. I can see the advantage of not
giving a winger room, but can also see a huge risk. Ajack
ajack, i'm a bit puzzled, too, but i think wayne only
actually said we "numbered up " from the outside in, and in practice
we certainly do seem to drift, rather than doing the LI thing where the winger
tries to literally come inside and take the 13 man and ball.
i think the implication of numbering up from outside would be that you
mustn't take the wrong guy so as to leave an overload wide? so maybe 10 must
cover his man and trust the inside cover to take anyone inside [with or
without the ball ] , as if he gets drawn in, 12 will have 2 guys to mark as a
result ?
broonie
Shine Draaaaahm
I realy think we've found the guy to take on Grays' mantle
in the coming years...his place kicking was supurb again ( the 60 yard shot had
the length and was only a lil wayward), and i cant believe Bris wasted him at
15. Maybe a diff west country club would have finnished bottom last year if he
had been played more at out half? Alan T
Yes he is developing into a fine player. i hope he was taken
off to give him a rest. Archie was certainly no competition. Chris H
I didn't go to Rotherham, but he has been mightily
impressive so far all season - exspecially his kick off
)) ady_32
And finally - 200 up for Grant
I've always rated him as a player, and it says much about
the quality of back row players we've had over the years that Grant's not been
a more permenant fixture in the team alan t
Three cheers for Grant – Hippo, Hippo, Hippo!
