Thoughts on others perception of Saints
By Broonie
August 18 2004
Most sites have previews of the season, and I enjoyed Chris Chaplin's preview on the Tigers site, but found it a bit off target as far as we were concerned; but that's the nature of the beast, isn't it?
|
W |
hen we read the
papers we are predisposed to believe what they say , except when they venture
into stuff whereof we have actual first hand knowledge, at which point we snort
"rubbish" and consign it to that night's fish wrapping. I see we got
the inconsistent tag (imho we have consistently done
well against teams who didn't beat up on our forwards, but ran up against teams
who were able to do just that when we got to the big games) .
The loss of John Lesley, Nick Beale and Budge Pountney was a bit of a red
herring in detail but raised a few points in principle. Budge was not a factor
last year, so we lost him then, we are not losing him now. Nick Beale was a
fans favourite, but in many ways must have been a coach's nightmare, and
goodness knows how many times he's ignored an unmarked Ben Cohen outside him in
the last few years; he did always use to have a great game against Tigers,
which may colour Chris's view - after all we only get to see other sides when
we play them normally. John Lesley, again, did not have his best season last
year (though not disastrous) and we must be hoping to actually upgrade at his
position one way or another. Just how our coaches handle the midfield is, in my
opinion,, going to be the key to our season.
The point of principle was that the above, together with Connors, constituted a
spine of experience within the team, as well as bedrock of commitment to the
club. That’s an interesting point and deserves consideration. First, will the
new regime be able to pull the squad, plus the whole organisation and the supporters
along with them the way
The signs are good, I think. It looks as if, had he stayed at
But how much experience and identity will we be losing this year? Will we be
starting anew in trying to build a new squad who will identify with and play
for each other and for the shirt?
As an exercise, I have written out the squad broken into groups, with senior
saintsmen only (those who had at least 2 1st team years under
Back
3 -REIHANA,COHEN, Clarke, Human , Rudd
Centres
- HYNDMAN, TUCKER, Vilk, Starling Stcherbina
Half
backs - ROBINSON, HOWARD,GRAYSON, DRAHM ( nice , eh ?)
Props
- SMITH, BUDGE
POUNTNEY, MORRIS, STURGESS Ross, Kempson
Hookers
- THOMPSON,
Locks
- HUNTER , LORD, O'Donahue , Boome , Browne.
Backrow
- BLOWERS, FOX, SODEN,
SEELY, Krige, McNamee.
It looks like a fair bit of continuity to me. this is important as Tim Exeter
has all the players physical stats and will be able to measure both the
returning and new players against these , and larks has all the films, notes and
records from previous games for the new coaches to familiarise themselves with
our own players and opponents ; also we have experienced players in all the
major groupings who can tell Solly how we did things under Wayne.; if you want
to change things , it's important to know what you're starting with.
I’m content that we are not really seen as much better than top 5 material by outsiders. It’s always good not to be rated too
high at the start of the season. Historically we are a top 3 team over the last
few years , and although most people have a fairly clear and unanimous view
that the big 5 clubs are some combination of us, Tigers,
Lastly, having tried my hand at analysing other clubs, I have to say I enjoyed Chris’s
article, but you have to bear in mind that for the clubs other than your own,
one's knowledge is so superficial you might as well be a journalist - after all
it's just an essay to keep us folk on the boards amused.
